Hebei Lansheng Biotech Co., Ltd. ShangHai Yuelian Biotech Co., Ltd.

Germany bets on integrated pest management for halving pesticide useqrcode

Feb. 22, 2023

Favorites Print
Feb. 22, 2023

By Julia Dahm

Implementing integrated pest management (IPM) is part of Germany’s toolbox to achieve the 50% reduction target the EU could set in its new pesticide legislation. But in practice, many hurdles stand in the way.

Both the risk and use of synthetic pesticides in Europe should be slashed in half by 2030, as per the aims of the EU’s flagship food policy, the Farm to Fork Strategy.

In its proposals for a reformed regulation on the sustainable use of plant protection products (SUR), which are currently being debated by the member states and the European Parliament, the European Commission foresees enshrining this in a binding, EU-wide target.

Germany has also committed to implementing the 50% target at the national level – and integrated pest management is a key element in the government’s plans to work towards this figure.

To work towards sustainable use of plant protection products, the ministry wants to ″set a clear focus″ on ″strengthening integrated pest management″ according to the conclusions of a government meeting on Germany’s plant protection national action plan.

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is an ecosystem-based strategy that focuses on managing pests through a combination of techniques applied in order of hierarchy to minimise the use of chemical plant protection products.

In effect, it means that chemical pesticides should only be used as a last resort if all other efforts fail.

Futile government efforts?

To help soften the blow of phasing out hazardous pesticides and ″develop alternative plant protection techniques and establish them in practice″, the agriculture ministry ″supports farms through research funding and through the agricultural investment programme″, a ministry spokesperson told EURACTIV Germany.

Moreover, she added, the ministry is working on updating its sector- and crop-specific guidelines on IPM.

Meanwhile, Germany’s strategic plan for the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) (see below for details), also includes an eco-scheme through which farmers can get funding in return for foregoing the use of chemical pesticides.

But despite all these efforts, the uptake of IPM techniques in Germany has been limited.

There is no direct data on the practical implementation of IPM principles in Germany, as the 2021 annual report on Germany’s national plant protection action plan points out.

But data on the use of synthetic pesticides can provide an indication of whether IPM techniques are effectively used to cut down on the former.

″In theory, you would expect that a full implementation of IPM would lead to a reduction in the use of pesticides – but this is not what we see,″ Max Meister, policy officer at the German environmental NGO NABU told EURACTIV.

Lack of funding and training

Since 2009, when the application of IPM techniques became mandatory through the EU directive on the use of pesticides (SUD), pesticide sales in Germany only fell very slightly, from around 30,000 tonnes of active substances in 2009 to around 28,000 in 2020, according to data from the Federal Environment Agency.

For Meister, this is due to a variety of factors. For one, unlike IPM techniques, the use of synthetic pesticides is deeply ingrained in farmers’ habits as well as their education, while there is a lack of advisory services they can consult.

″Advisory offices are often completely understaffed and cannot keep up with demand,″ he said, explaining that this void is ″often filled by industry consultants, which act in their own economic interest, and this is at odds with reducing pesticides.″

The economic calculation is also rarely in favour of picking organic pest control techniques over pesticides, according to Meister. In his view, introducing financial incentives would be a step towards encouraging the uptake of an IPM approach.

This could be either negative incentives such as taxes on hazardous pesticides or positive ones in the form of compensation for financial losses incurred by reducing plant protection products – the eco scheme introduced this year is already a first example, albeit with limited financial weight, according to the activist.

Challenges for wine, fruit, and vegetable production

Meanwhile, the German Farmers’ Union (DBV) stressed that farmers are already doing a lot to implement an IPM approach to plant protection, while an additional reduction of pesticide use would be a major challenge, especially for some sectors and regions in Germany.

Read more at Euractiv



More from AgroNewsChange

Hot Topic More

Subscribe Comment


Subscribe Email: *
Mobile Number:  





Subscribe AgroNews Daily Alert to send news related to your mailbox