nav Searchuser
Maxunitech Inc.
Beijing Multigrass Formulation Co., Ltd.

Subsidies, tax incentives related to agrochemicals exceed R$14 billion per year in Brazilqrcode

Jul. 8, 2019

Favorites Print
Forward
Jul. 8, 2019
By Leonardo Gottems, reporter for Agropages
 
According to data released during a public hearing on tax exemptions related to agrochemicals in Brazil, held in the capital, Brasília, pesticides are eligible for a 60% reduction when calculating Tax on Movement of Goods and Services (ICMS) and total exemption from the Tax on Industrialized Products (IPI). These are also other forms of direct and indirect incentives related to the use of agrochemicals. 
 
Estimates indicate that the country granted tax exemptions related to pesticides worth at least R$2.07 billion. According to public defense lawyer Marcelo Carneiro Novaes, in 2016 alone, over R$14 billion in tax subsidies were transferred to Brazil’s agrochemical industry, equating to R$70 per person.
 
Out of this total figure, R$8.3 billion are in the form of tax benefits related to non-collection of taxes, such as ICMS, IPI (Tax on Industrialized Products) and import tax, while another R$6 billion are in the form of indirect tax subsidies, as the law requires agricultural defensive to be classified as income, which can be fully deducted from the taxable income of rural producers, individuals or legal entities, he added.
 
Novaes also highlighted further credit incentives, such as the interest rate offered by the Safra Plan, as agrochemicals account for about 17% of the total cost of Brazilian agricultural production. He also noted various financial incentives, such as amnesty, debt renegotiation and barter contracts.
 
"Companies finance purchases with unreasonable interest rates for medium and small producers. I estimate that if they charge a rate of 15%, agricultural producers will pay interest to companies worth around R$4.5 billion per year. That is an estimate. If industries borrowed R$30 billion, and if only three credit titles were launched, the loss of revenue would be R$1 billion. This is a conservative estimate," Novaes said.
 
"I am not against subsidies, but I am against exempting the most dangerous pesticides along with less toxic and less harmful ones to the environment. Unequal products deserve unequal treatment. Brazil exports billions of dollars of agricultural commodities, which require the use of 80% of all agrochemicals that pollute water and the environment and require aerial spraying. In 2017, this figure totalled US$96 billion, and only R$5,000 was collected. The share of agriculture and related services, except the food industry, is only 0.3% of total revenue," he argued.
 
Collecting fees related to agrochemicals is defended by some environmental and health activists. One form of categorisation could be level of toxicity, with more toxic substances requiring higher rates of taxes.
 
Source: AgroNews

Picture 0/1200

More from AgroNews

Magazine

Annual Review 2019 2019 CRO & CRAO Manual
2019 Market Insight Chinese issue of 2019 Market Insight
2019 India Pesticide Suppliers Guide 2019 Biologicals Special
Subscribe Comment

Subscribe 

Subscribe Email: *
Name:
Mobile Number:  

Comment  

Picture 0/1200

Subscribe to daily email alerts of AgroNews.