nav Searchuser
Maxunitech Inc.
Beijing Multigrass Formulation Co., Ltd.

A WSU study finds exposure to prevalent herbicide Roundup can cause problems generations laterqrcode

Jun. 6, 2019

Favorites Print
Forward
Jun. 6, 2019

Ask which traits someone inherited from their grandmother and they might point to their distinctive nose or squeaky knees.
 
But a first-of-its kind study from Washington State University shows that what your grandparents and great-grandparents were exposed to could affect your susceptibility to health issues from kidney disease to obesity, and even your ability to reproduce.
 
For the multiyear study, researchers including Michael Skinner, a WSU professor of biological sciences, exposed pregnant rats to just half the rate of the commonly used herbicide Roundup that is considered OK for exposure.
 
What they found could change the way governments set health limits for chemicals.
 
Chemically known as glyphosate , Roundup is the most commonly used herbicide in the world, accounting for almost 72 percent of pesticide use, as noted in the study, published in the journal Nature in April.
 
Because of the way crops absorb it, pretty much everyone gets exposed, Skinner says.
 
"When we talk about glyphosate exposure, it's not so much from being sprayed around the farms and stuff. It's actually from the food we eat," he says. "Anything made out of corn and soy, basically, has glyphosate in it."
 
The herbicide is largely considered safe because, as this study — and many others — showed, there were no health issues with either the initial mother rat who was directly exposed over a week, or with her baby, Skinner says.
 
"There's no toxicity, no disease, we didn't find any major issues," Skinner says. "So we confirmed just like Monsanto says, and the government [Environmental Protection Agency] says, this is an extremely safe compound. It's probably one of the safest compounds for direct exposure known. The problem is if you breed the animals out another generation or two, disease dramatically increases."
 
In fact, about 90 percent of the next two generations developed health problems by the time they were 1 year old, including kidney disease, obesity, or problems with their ovaries, testicles or prostate.
 
The most dramatic finding, Skinner says, was that about one-third of the future generations had miscarriages and/or died during pregnancy.
 
"That was a surprising phenotype and it was very reproducible," Skinner says. "We can't correlate if it's glyphosate at this point, but it was intriguing. We didn't see that in the control group."
 
All of those health problems occured in the third and fourth generation despite the only exposure to glyphosate happening to the initial pregnant rat.
 
Looking just at direct exposure, the limits for glyphosate and many other chemicals would be considered good, but looking down the line, Skinner says it's clear there's a larger concern with generational impacts.
 
"It's something we've never focused on before," Skinner says. "If we focus on just direct exposure, everything is just sort of hunky-dory fine. But we now know that we could be influencing our future generations."
 
Skinner says this is just the latest of several studies he's worked on looking into generational toxicology — essentially examining how the sperm and egg can get changed with exposure to various chemicals, resulting in the passing of negative traits onto subsequent generations.
 
His work has shown that it's not always the DNA itself getting changed, but rather that certain compounds can hook up to DNA and essentially turn certain traits on or off, making people more susceptible to certain health problems.
 
"What we have been studying heavily is identifying those marks on the DNA that are changed, so we could diagnose maybe which diseases you're going to be susceptible to later in life," Skinner says. "If we knew this genetic makeup in your 20s or 30s, it turns out there's a whole range of therapeutic drugs that could prevent problems."
 
For example, there are some drugs that can delay the onset of breast cancer, he says, and diet and lifestyle changes could be made in advance of other issues.
 
"I think this will push us into the era of preventive medicine," Skinner says. "We aren't really there yet. We think about it, but right now we have reactionary medicine: We don't actually see the doctor till we have a disease."
 
But with more research into the impacts of Roundup and other widely used chemicals and compounds, ideally scientists and doctors can help people avoid some of the worst impacts and better understand how their exposure could impact their progeny, Skinner says.
 
"It's not just a decision of our own right now to say, 'I don't mind being exposed to this,'" Skinner says. "If those have effects generations down the line, we have a responsibility to our future generations."
 
Source: inlander.com

Picture 0/1200

More from AgroNews

Sichuan Lomon Bio Technology Co., Ltd.

Magazine

2019 India Pesticide Suppliers Guide 2019 Biologicals Special
2019 Latin America Focus 2019 Formulation & Adjuvant Technology
Annual Review 2018 Chinese issue of Annual Review 2018
Subscribe Comment

Subscribe 

Subscribe Email: *
Name:
Mobile Number:  

Comment  

Picture 0/1200

Subscribe to daily email alerts of AgroNews.