Hebei Lansheng Biotech Co., Ltd.
Beijing Multigrass Formulation Co., Ltd.

California Supreme Court declines to hear Monsanto's glyphosate label appealqrcode

Aug. 21, 2018

Favorites Print
Aug. 21, 2018

The California Supreme Court refused to hear Monsanto's appeal to remove glyphosate , a major component of the company's Roundup herbicide, from California's list of chemicals that cause cancer or birth defects. The state had placed glyphosate on the list pursuant to Proposition 65, based on the 2015 determination by the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) that glyphosate is "probably carcinogenic". Monsanto challenged both the constitutionality of the listing process and the integrity of IARC. Center for Food Safety (CFS) intervened in the lawsuit to defend the science-based IARC listing process against Monsanto's anti-science attacks.
In refusing to hear Monsanto's appeal, the Supreme Court upheld the decision by the First District Court of Appeal that the listing mechanism in Proposition 65 is proper. The appellate court emphasized that Proposition 65 delegates the factual authority of substance safety to IARC because state health officials have failed to protect Californian residents from hazardous substances in the past.
CFS applauds the Court's decision. "The authors of Proposition 65 recognized that listing decisions should be based solely on science, and immune from political and economic pressure," said Adam Keats, Senior Attorney at CFS, "Fortunately, the courts saw through Monsanto's desperate attempt to assert its influence in this process."
The Court's decision to keep glyphosate on the hazardous chemicals list comes just five days after a San Francisco jury found Monsanto responsible for a Dewayne Johnson's cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, after the company failed to disclose the dangers of its glyphosate-heavy herbicides before selling them to Johnson's former employer, the Benicia Unified School District. The jury said Monsanto had "acted with malice or oppression" and awarded the former school groundskeeper $289 million in damages from Monsanto.

Picture 0/1200

More from AgroNews


2020 Biologicals Special 2020 Latin America Focus
2020 Formulation & Adjuvant Technology Annual Review 2019
Chinese issue of Annual Review 2019 2019 CRO & CRAO Manual
Subscribe Comment


Subscribe Email: *
Mobile Number:  


Picture 0/1200

Subscribe to daily email alerts of AgroNews.