English 
搜索
Hebei Lansheng Biotech Co., Ltd. ShangHai Yuelian Biotech Co., Ltd.

Syngenta rejects Monsanto’s second takeoverqrcode

Jun. 9, 2015

Favorites Print
Forward
Jun. 9, 2015
Syngenta said on Monday that it had rejected a second takeover approach from Monsanto.

Syngenta said it received another letter from Monsanto last Saturday, essentially repeating its prior offer to acquire the company for about $45 billion. Syngenta rejected a takeover bid by Monsanto in May, in part citing potential regulatory concerns.

The latest offer added a $2 billion breakup fee if the merger proved unpalatable to regulators, which Syngenta said was “wholly inadequate” and “paltry.”

“Monsanto’s second letter represents the same inadequate price, same inadequate regulatory undertakings to close, same regulatory risks and same issues associated with dual headquarters’ moves,” Syngenta said in a news release. “As such, we have reiterated our prior rejection of Monsanto’s proposal.”

In rejecting the prior offer, Syngenta said Monsanto’s bid undervalued Syngenta’s prospects and underestimated “the significant execution risks, including regulatory and public scrutiny at multiple levels in many countries.”
On Monday, Syngenta said that its board, in conjunction with its legal advisers, did not believe that the regulatory concerns would be resolved by “a pre-agreed and pre-announced package of horizontal divestitures, which is Monsanto’s proposed approach.”

Monsanto has said that it would sell Syngenta’s seed business and other overlapping businesses.

If the deal were announced and was not consummated, it could cause “significant harm and value destruction for Syngenta and its shareholders,” Syngenta said.

Monsanto offered to pay 449 Swiss francs, or about $477, for each share of Syngenta; 45 percent of the payment would be in cash.

The deal would create an agricultural behemoth, combining Monsanto, the world leader in seeds and genetically engineered traits, such as herbicide resistance, with Syngenta, the largest producer of agricultural chemicals.

Source: nytimes

0/1200

More from AgroNewsChange

Hot Topic More

Subscribe Comment

Subscribe 

Subscribe Email: *
Name:
Mobile Number:  

Comment  

0/1200

 

NEWSLETTER

Subscribe AgroNews Daily Alert to send news related to your mailbox