English 
搜索
Hebei Lansheng Biotech Co., Ltd. ShangHai Yuelian Biotech Co., Ltd.

Pesticides in Malaysiaqrcode

Mar. 16, 2009

Favorites Print
Forward
Mar. 16, 2009

Banned agro-chemicals continue to find their way into rice fields
Images of golden brown rice stalks swaying in the gentle breeze or a sprawling green vista come to mind when one thinks of the padi fields of Kedah. Apart from the knowledge that at 96,558ha the Muda Agriculture Development Agency (Mada) is the largest rice production centre in the country, many may not have a clue as to what goes into the production of the staple grain.


Set up in the late 1960s, Mada was envisioned to be the proverbial rice bowl as part of the socio-economic development plan of Malaysia. Today, it accounts for close to 50% of the country’s rice production of 2.3 million tonnes.


In June, Mada will turn 39. Apparently things are not all going well in the rice fields and among the 48,500 farmers who toil to put the pearly white grains on our plates. Plagued by floods and droughts in recent years which the farmers attribute to climate change as well as diminishing soil fertility and pesticide poisoning, rice farming has never been more challenging.


Other problems notwithstanding, it now appears that agro-chemicals misuse, a habit inevitably inculcated by the government subsidy scheme, is proving to be a hard habit to kick.


Under the Pesticides Act 1974, 28 insecticides, herbicides and fungicides have been banned. However, the notorious endosulfan, a highly acute toxin and a suspected endocrine disruptor, which was banned in November 2005 with a one year phase-out period to clear existing stocks is still widely applied in rice farms.


Marketed under the trade name of Thiodan by Bayer, endosulfan is heavily relied on by farmers in the Mada scheme to solve all sorts of pest attacks.


Endosulfan is banned in more than 50 countries. Due to its high toxicity and high potential for bioaccumulation and environmental contamination, a global ban on the use and manufacture of endosulfan is being considered under the Stockholm Convention. The international agreement to phase out harmful chemicals referred to as Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) decided at its meeting last October to list endosulfan as a POP by its next meeting at the end of the year.


Set up in the late 1960s, Mada was envisioned to be the proverbial rice bowl as part of the socio-economic development plan of Malaysia. Today, it accounts for close to 50% of the country’s rice production of 2.3 million tonnes.


In June, Mada will turn 39. Apparently things are not all going well in the rice fields and among the 48,500 farmers who toil to put the pearly white grains on our plates. Plagued by floods and droughts in recent years which the farmers attribute to climate change as well as diminishing soil fertility and pesticide poisoning, rice farming has never been more challenging.


Other problems notwithstanding, it now appears that agro-chemicals misuse, a habit inevitably inculcated by the government subsidy scheme, is proving to be a hard habit to kick.


Under the Pesticides Act 1974, 28 insecticides, herbicides and fungicides have been banned. However, the notorious endosulfan, a highly acute toxin and a suspected endocrine disruptor, which was banned in November 2005 with a one year phase-out period to clear existing stocks is still widely applied in rice farms.


Marketed under the trade name of Thiodan by Bayer, endosulfan is heavily relied on by farmers in the Mada scheme to solve all sorts of pest attacks.


Endosulfan is banned in more than 50 countries. Due to its high toxicity and high potential for bioaccumulation and environmental contamination, a global ban on the use and manufacture of endosulfan is being considered under the Stockholm Convention. The international agreement to phase out harmful chemicals referred to as Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) decided at its meeting last October to list endosulfan as a POP by its next meeting at the end of the year.

Rice farmers Ishak Abdul Kadir of Kg Gandai (left) and Azmi Abdul Jalil of Kg Air Hitam in Jerlun, Kedah, holding a range of pesticides containing endosulfan which they referred to as racun Cina as the packaging carries only descriptions in Chinese words. They say farmers have no choice but to rely on the banned pesticide for its effectiveness.

 

Chemicals-dependent
However, rice farmers in the Mada scheme openly admit that the prohibited substance is available and constantly sprayed to rid the farms of pests, especially the golden apple snail (siput gondang emas).


Generally referred to as racun Cina (Chinese poison) as the packaging carries only descriptions in Chinese words, farmers say they have no choice but to rely on the banned pesticide “for its effectiveness”.


Ismail Shafie, 36, of Permatang Kenanga pays RM6 for a packet and generally uses two packets for one relong (about 0.4ha) to kill off the snails. “It’s the most effective solution but we are worried about the side-effects.”


From time to time, there have been newspaper reports of farmers complaining of skin rashes and sprayers falling sick after applying the chemicals in the field.


Veteran farmer Tajudin Yaakob, 55, echoes Ismail’s sentiments. He says farmers have been buying agro-chemicals such as endosulfan and methomyl from the black market, adding that the contraband came from Thailand.


He claims that endosulfan is readily supplied by at least five shops in his area, Kampung Air Hitam in Jerlun. “But they’ll only sell to farmers whom they trust,” he adds.


As the Agriculture Department has beefed up enforcement, sellers and buyers have devised ingenious ways to evade detection. For example, farmers would place orders in the shop but pick up the contraband in a rubbish bin at another location.


Tajudin says his problem with pests began after he switched from the traditional transplanting practice to direct seeding 15 years ago. Before Mada’s intervention, farmers sow rice seeds in a nursery and transplant the saplings to the growing plot later.


“Twenty years ago, I used buffaloes to plough my farm and I never used pesticides. But now, my farm cannot do without these chemicals,” he adds.


His neighbour Azmi Abdul Jalil, 60, shares his frustrations. “The number of pesticides used have increased tremendously. For one relong we spend RM120 for two rounds of herbicide spraying and RM45 for three times of pesticide spraying and that excludes labour costs,” he explains.

 

More checks
Agriculture Department deputy director-general (operation) Sulaiman Md Zain admits that use of contraband agro-chemicals is a growing problem but the authorities are doing all they can to curb smuggling and nab local culprits who offer the prohibited chemicals to farmers.


He says enforcement together with Customs officers had some success but is frustrated by pacts between farmers and suppliers. “Suppliers even go direct to the farms and this is rampant in the Mada area. However, we are educating the farmers through our extension programme on the danger of these banned chemicals.”


In Kedah and Perlis, out of 290 premises that were licensed to sell agro-chemicals, 59 operators had their permits revoked for contravening the Pesticides Act in 2006.


Since 2007, Sulaiman says roadblocks at entry points bordering Thailand have been mounted following reports of smuggling, and raids have been extended to farms.


“The contraband is usually concealed in vegetable trucks coming from Thailand.” He adds that due to limited resources, there is no 100% inspection and enforcement relies on tip-offs and intelligence gathering.


In the last two years, only two of the 21 roadblocks uncovered contraband. At the farms, 442 raids were conducted, with 20 confiscations and 12 convictions. Between 1998 and 2008, 6,271 checks conducted nationwide resulted in 555 confiscations, 365 prosecutions and half a million ringgit in fines. No offenders were jailed.


 

Damaging subsidies
Critics of agro-chemicals say the Government fails to see the co-relation between its agro-chemical subsidies and chemical dependence in the country’s rice fields.


Third World Network sustainable agriculture researcher Lim Li Ching says the problem afflicting Mada can be traced to the adoption of the Green Revolution by Malaysia. The Green Revolution is an international movement which started in the 1960s on agriculture expansion to feed growing populations.


“Mada spearheaded the two-season farming practice with government subsidies in high yield varieties (HYV) and agro-chemical inputs. As with the Green Revolution, mono-cropping of HYV is accompanied by a rapid rise in pesticide application as these varieties were more susceptible to pest outbreaks,” she explains.


By the 70s, she adds, Green Revolution-style farming has replaced the traditional farming practices of many developing countries. By the 90s, almost 75% of Asian rice areas were sown with these new varieties.


The Mada area is planted with several types of HYVs developed by the Malaysian Agriculture Research and Development Institute (Mardi).


Consumers Association of Penang education officer N.V. Subbarow urges the Government to review its subsidy policies and take steps to reform the rice growing system.


Sulaiman says the department is encouraging sustainable agricultural practices that include the reduction in the use of chemicals and organic farming methods but acknowledges that so far the programme only reaches out to vegetable and fruit farmers.

0/1200

More from AgroNewsChange

Hot Topic More

Subscribe Comment

Subscribe 

Subscribe Email: *
Name:
Mobile Number:  

Comment  

0/1200

 

NEWSLETTER

Subscribe AgroNews Daily Alert to send news related to your mailbox