English 
搜索
Hebei Lansheng Biotech Co., Ltd. ShangHai Yuelian Biotech Co., Ltd.

Pesticide alternatives for California strawberriesqrcode

Sep. 25, 2013

Favorites Print
Forward
Sep. 25, 2013
For decades, California strawberry growers like Rod Koda injected the potent pesticide methyl bromide into soil to kill bugs, weeds and plant diseases before planting strawberries.

But the chemical was slated to be phased out by international treaty because it depletes the Earth’s ozone layer. And later its replacement methyl iodide was pulled off the market after numerous public protests.

Now, California regulators have proposed stricter rules to protect the public from a third fumigant that Koda and other conventional berry growers use to sanitize their fields. The restrictions are pushing California’s $2.3 billion strawberry industry toward developing nonchemical alternatives to pesticides.

The industry and state have poured millions of dollars into research, but they say alternatives such as sterilizing soil with steam or growing berries in peat are not ready for prime time. California supplies nearly 90 percent of the nation’s strawberries.

“We’re so limited in what we can do and the restrictions that are out there, it’s getting tighter and tighter,” says Koda, who grows strawberries on 28 acres in Watsonville. “Some of the alternatives don’t show uniform results — a win-win one year and next year dead plants all over your field.”

Since the 1960s, California strawberry growers have fumigated their fields before each crop is planted to control devastating soil-borne pests, increase yields and produce uniform and disease-free fruit.

But expansion of urban development bordering berry fields on the Central Coast and in Southern California has increased unease over the dangers of fumigants to residents and farmworkers.

Growers and state regulators say the chemicals are safe with precautions such as not using fumigants in buffer zones near schools and residential areas and posting signs that prohibit entry to fields.

Critics say those protections aren’t sufficient. Fumigants are among the most dangerous pesticides, since their gaseous state enables them to drift from under the plastic tarps where they are applied, says Sara Knight of Pesticide Action Network, which is asking regulators to end fumigation by 2020.

Methyl iodide was pulled from the U.S. market by its Japanese manufacturer last year after criticism from environmentalists and scientists who say the chemical may cause cancer. And only a small portion of growers are still allowed to use methyl bromide before it’s completely disallowed.

Most growers now have access to two fumigants: Telone and chloropicrin.

After regulators In 2011 designated chloropicrin as an air pollutant to which may pose a hazard to human health, they proposed increasing buffer zones and limiting the number of acres that the chemical can be applied at one location.

Alternatives

Environmentalists and farmworkers say those rules are not strict enough for chloropicrin, an eye and lung irritant once used in chemical warfare.

A state-convened working group formed to discuss alternatives to fumigation called in April for more testing of nonchemical alternatives in the fields — and for grants or crop insurance to help growers mitigate the risk of adopting the new methods.

Many growers are already experimenting with growing strawberries without fumigation. On part of his land, Koda mixes a carbon source such as rice bran into the soil, places a tarp over the field and saturates the beds with water to trigger growth of bacteria.

The bacteria rid the soil of Verticillium, one of the most persistent berry diseases, at similar levels that fumigation does, says University of California, Santa Cruz researcher Carol Shennan. But the method — called anaerobic soil disinfestation — is more time consuming, does not yet control for other strawberry diseases, and there isn’t enough rice bran for all the growers.
“People said for years that growing strawberries without fumigation couldn’t be done,” says Steven Fennimore, a researcher with the University of California, Davis. “But to a limited extent it can be done. The technology is there.”

Phasing out fumigation doesn’t mean conventional strawberries would be grown organically, which entails frequent rotation of fields and use of cover crops. Conventional growers would continue to use chemical herbicides and fertilizers.

Regulators and growers alike say more research is needed. “Until growers learn how to work out the bugs and we can get a consistent application and outcome. We will not take the risk to stop using chemicals,” Koda says.

0/1200

More from AgroNewsChange

Hot Topic More

Subscribe Comment

Subscribe 

Subscribe Email: *
Name:
Mobile Number:  

Comment  

0/1200

 

NEWSLETTER

Subscribe AgroNews Daily Alert to send news related to your mailbox