Hebei Lansheng Biotech Co., Ltd.
Beijing Multigrass Formulation Co., Ltd.

CropLife Australia: Government action needed to cut agricultural red tape hindering plant science innovationsqrcode

Apr. 3, 2017

Favorites Print
Apr. 3, 2017
The Productivity Commission’s final report into Regulation of Australian Agriculture is an urgent call to action for the Federal Government to remove unnecessary regulations on genetically modified (GM) crop innovations and improve agricultural chemical regulatory efficiency, thereby ensuring the future success of Australia’s agriculture industry. 
Matthew Cossey, Chief Executive Officer of CropLife Australia, said “We welcome the release of the Productivity Commission’s final report and recommendations that reaffirm the importance of efficiency in agchem regulations, such as better use of international evidence in assessments.” 
“The cost of every crop protection product that reaches the market is now at US$286 million and takes 11 years of research and development. At the same time, farmers face ever increasing pest and climate pressures whilst always seeking to improve yield. It is now more important than ever to make the changes necessary to ensure the latest innovations are in the hands of Australia’s farmer more quickly while still ensuring the highest safety and efficacy standards.” 
“Australia is fortunate to have an independent, scientifically competent and technically proficient regulator, however ongoing issues relating to efficiency, predictability and consistency, now being compounded by an unnecessary move to Armidale, are seriously affecting farmer access to the latest crop protection products.” 
“Implementation of a national control-of-use regime for agricultural chemicals and increasing harmonisation of off-label use provisions would also remove duplication and inconsistencies. These are simple measures that can be actioned now to remove unnecessary costs to industry and farmers.” 
“With more than 20 years of successful use of GM crops being grown side-by-side with non-GM crops in Australia and internationally, it’s not surprising to see the Commission recommend the removal of the moratoria (prohibitions) on GM crops in New South Wales, South Australia, Tasmania and the Australian Capital Territory,” said Mr Cossey. 
“The removal of the moratoria and repeal of the relevant legislation in Western Australia late last year secured farmer choice in a state that has benefited financially, agronomically and environmentally from the use of GM canola. It is further evidence policies based on facts and science have never been more crucial given the ever-increasing demands on farming.” 
“The Commission’s recommendation that these state governments should also seek to increase public knowledge about GM crops is a welcome reminder of the need for government leadership and commitment to Australian farmers and their choice to use safe and approved agricultural tools.” 
“The significant amount of misleading and baseless claims in relation to GM crops made by well-organised activist organisations does not serve the Australian public well and has been the basis of unnecessary labelling requirements of foods containing genetically modified genes,” said Mr Cossey. 
“A truly productive, competitive and sustainable agricultural industry in Australia requires regulatory oversight that is efficient, effective and where necessary commensurate with the risks, costs and benefits to the broader community. We now look forward to the Federal Government acting on the Commission’s recommendations,” concluded Mr Cossey.
Source: CropLife

Picture 0/1200

More from AgroNews


2020 Biologicals Special 2020 Latin America Focus
2020 Formulation & Adjuvant Technology Annual Review 2019
Chinese issue of Annual Review 2019 2019 CRO & CRAO Manual
Subscribe Comment


Subscribe Email: *
Mobile Number:  


Picture 0/1200

Subscribe to daily email alerts of AgroNews.